The FinancialContent Network     SocialPicks Community   |   MarketMinute Monitor   |   MarketMinute Market Updates   |   MarketMinute Stock News
SocialPicks
   Sign Up   |   Log In   |   What is SocialPicks?     
Please sign up for SocialPicks site access - it's free!

6 pts

Opinion on  Lee Enterprises Inc. (LEE)     Sector: Services  >  Industry: Printing & Publishing
LEE: Should Lee Enterprises Investors Stop the Presses or Pick Up a Scoop?

Mar 03, 2008 02:55 PM GMT
Billtrent
Return Risk
-13.54% HIGH
Principal


Creative Commons License photo credit: qnr

This article is a reprint of my February 21, 2008 RealMoney column

The last year hasn’t been a good time to own a newspaper. The best performing stock was Washington Post (WPO), which managed not to decline significantly. New York Times (NYT) and Gannett ( GCI - Annual Report ) are down as much as half, while smaller firms like Lee Enterprises (LEE), Belo Corp. (BLC), McClatchy (MNI) and Journal Register (JRC) have registered declines ranging from 60-80%.

Always on the eye for a contrarian opportunity, I wondered if the time might be right to take a stake in one of the papers. The one that most attracts my eye is Lee. Lee provides of local news, information and advertising in primarily midsize markets, with 50 daily newspapers and a joint interest in five others, rapidly growing online sites and more than 300 weekly newspapers and specialty publications in 23 states. In 2005, the Company acquired Pulitzer and has since trimmed the combined operations by selling certain local papers and printing operations.

Although its valuation multiples and price performance resemble those of the other small firms, Lee is less heavily leveraged (a mere 3:1 debt/market cap ratio compared to 4:1 at McClatchy and 12:1 at Journal Register) and generates a significantly higher free cash flow yield than those firms. Compared to Belo, its Zacks rank of 2 indicates favorable earnings revisions, while Belo is in the worst category.

However, it will take more than being the best in a rotten bunch to make me take the plunge. Lee has to offer some real value, and pay me for the risk I would be taking by owning the name. At first glance, the 10% free cash flow yield (operating cash flow plus after-tax interest expense minus capital expenditures, divided by enterprise value) and 6.4% dividend yield would appear to do the trick. But are they sustainable?

There doesn’t appear to be much near-term risk to the dividend due to its relatively small share of annual cash flows. Pension plan is under-funded by $75 million, but the annual required contributions are just a few million.

The biggest concern relates to $306 million in notes issued in conjunction with the Pulitzer acquisition, which are due in April 2009. It would be tough to come up with that money in the current credit environment, but at some point over the next year I expect the credit markets to return to normal. Under its credit agreements, Lee can also increase its line of credit by up to $500 million as long as it meets certain financial criteria.

The Best Laid Plans

Over the longer term, Lee will have to generate at least modest revenue growth (the consensus five-year estimate is 5%) and execute according to its plan. Unfortunately, the plan is running into some road blocks.

Lee Enterprises’ Stated Corporate Plan

Plan

Reality

Grow revenue creatively and rapidly

In the latest quarter, revenues declined 6.2% compared to the prior year

Deliver strong local news and information

Presumably going according to plan

Accelerate online innovation

Online ad revenue was sufficient to offset declines in print advertising in FY 2007, but in the December quarter it was not

Continue expanding audiences

Average daily newspaper circulation units decreased 2.0% and Sunday circulation decreased 2.5% for the 13 weeks ended December 30, 2007, compared to the prior year

Nurture employee development and achievement

In 2007, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch concluded an offering of early retirement incentives that resulted in an adjustment of staffing levels

Exercise careful cost control

Costs were cut by 4.9%, but revenue fell at a faster rate

Source: Company filings

Earnings Quality

Until the management can effectively put their plan into action, revenues and earnings look set for continued declines. In 2007 operating income decreased $5,157,000, or 2.5%.

Tax settlements reduced income tax expense by $6,880,000 in 2007. On an apples to apples basis, earnings per share declined from $1.82 to $1.66.

While the earnings are declining, they do appear trustworthy. The accrual ratio measures the difference between cash-based earnings and accounting (accrual) based earnings. The closer to zero, the better. With the exception of a spike in 2005 related to the Pulitzer acquisition, Lee’s earnings quality has been high.

<!--[if gte vml 1]> <v :shapetype id="_x0000_t75" coordsize="21600,21600" o:spt="75" o:preferrelative="t" path="m@4@5l@4@11@9@11@9@5xe" filled="f" stroked="f"> <v :stroke joinstyle="miter"/> </v> <v :formulas> <v :f eqn="if lineDrawn pixelLineWidth 0"/> <v :f eqn="sum @0 1 0"/> <v :f eqn="sum 0 0 @1"/> <v :f eqn="prod @2 1 2"/> <v :f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelWidth"/> <v :f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelHeight"/> <v :f eqn="sum @0 0 1"/> <v :f eqn="prod @6 1 2"/> <v :f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelWidth"/> <v :f eqn="sum @8 21600 0"/> <v :f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelHeight"/> <v :f eqn="sum @10 21600 0"/> </v> <v :path o:extrusionok="f" gradientshapeok="t" o:connecttype="rect"/> <o :lock v:ext="edit" aspectratio="t"/> <v :shape id="_x0000_i1025" type="#_x0000_t75" style='width:6in; height:268.5pt'> <v :imagedata src="file:///C:\DOCUME~1\WILLIA~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\msohtml1\01\clip_image001.emz" o:title=""/> </v> < ![endif]--> <!--[if !vml]--> lee-accruals.jpg <!--[endif]-->

Source: Zacks Research Wizard , compiled by William A. Trent

I Would Look to Enhance Yield With Options

Although a put-write may offer another alternative play on the name, the options are thinly traded. The March 12.50 puts are available for approximately $1.45 at the time of writing, while the March 10’s are trading at about $0.30. The choice would depend upon the investor’s objective: someone wanting to own the shares at a lower price could use the $12.50’s to get an effective purchase price of just over $11.00, while an investor who doesn’t really want the shares could get a 3% one-month yield on money at risk using the 10’s.

I also think if I wrote put options and ended up with the shares, I would turn around and write covered calls to continue enhancing the yield and offsetting some of the risk.

Disclosures: None

Zacks Investment Research has provided Stock Market Beat with a complimentary trial subscription to Research Wizard.





LEE:  This call was made on 03/03/08 @ $10.3175
Rating:   Neutral/Hold   $10.3175 (03/03/08)
Gain/Loss:   -65.88% in 616 days
Target:   $11.00 (+6.61%) in > one year


Add Comment

Be the first to comment on this story and earn 2 points.

Your Comment



ROCK-STAR INVESTORS
Rank Name Sharpe Ratio Avg Return Followers
1 21.10 +34.56% 369
2 18.14 +69.43% 206
3 17.66 +25.71% 53
4 13.47 +14.32% 61
5 12.13 +75.75% 34


POPULAR STOCKS
Symbol Company Name Sentiment

TODAY'S HEADLINES

TODAY'S TOP PICKS

 
Lee Enterprises Inc. (LEE)
   SocialPicks Sentiment:   

   This Quarter's Sentiment:
All:
29.0%
Top:
0.0%




Latest Picks by Stock Market Beat
Symbol SP Sentiment Rating Return Since
OMI N/A Positive -8.72% 08/29/08
LPNT Positive -11.74% 08/28/08
JAH Positive +10.89% 08/27/08
NCS Positive -94.74% 08/26/08
CHTT Positive -3.81% 08/25/08

View All >
   




IN THE PRESS
Press_forbes Press_washingtonpost Press_wsj Press_npr Press_techcrunch